Friday, September 21, 2007

The eternal rocks beneath

HJ8165a-R3-4

“The perfect man for you is someone like Dalai Lama, but an asshole,” said Tuan. Presumably, he meant someone who was emotionally and spiritually developed like the Dalai Lama. Laid-back, but with the full capability of being a badass (not assholeelse, I can only imagine what my friends take me for).

Wolper's assignment to me was to write out a list, so that I may identify certain patterns. And while I fully understand the purpose of this assignment, I feel like we're placing too much undue emphasis on Chiik's romantic life. I farmed it out to Waldorf, who could probably come up with as good a list as if I had written it myself. Or better. Here's what she came up with (in no particular order):
  • not scrawny or delicatedoesn't look like he's grown up in the shade with his collars up
  • knows how to throw a ball
  • is able to kick some ass when called forwon't let anyone take advantage of the people he loves, and can throw a punch to make sure no one does
  • isn't a picky eater
  • has strengths complementary to mine (e.g.: super-social)
  • isn't immediately (or ever) completely understandablecan be an emotional/psychological challenge but also presents intrigue, even if it is in small ways
  • isn't small-minded
  • isn't a petty complainer
  • is literate
  • is settled enough in his life so that he can focus on me every once in a while
In all, the list is not bad. I think I'd add three more items:
  • is ambitious—successful at what he does
  • is even-tempered—does not fly into rages or uncontrollable bursts of anger
  • is comfortable around the unconventional, but doesn't feel the need to prove it
During this exercise, Waldorf concluded that I want not Darcy but Heathcliff. Heathcliff never occurred to me as particularly literate or super-social. I am sure he wasn't a picky eater, although the book isn't explicit on that point. Right, silly. It must be that emotionally-challenged ass-kicking aspect that Waldorf refers—a troubling realization which leads me to ponder how far I must have fallen in her esteem, given her hatred of that novel and any person who aspires to or identifies with the two lovers.

Tuesday, September 11, 2007

It's raining

September 11th falls on a Tuesday again this year. It's not a clear day; it’s raining. These are the details we recount from that day as if to prove to ourselves of our continued connection as actors, witnesses and heirs to this event, which must continue to hold meaning. It is a public show attempting to thwart the inevitable failure of memory. It isn’t enough to do so privately:
We’d be thrown back into what they now knew to be the weightless irrelevance of [our] personal affairs, once more separated from ‘the world of reality’ and an épaisseur triste, the ‘sad opaqueness’ of a private life centered about nothing but itself. (Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future, Preface)
Here, Arendt refers to the gap between past and future, using the French Resistance as example of the failure to pass down the knowledge experienced during anomalous and violent ruptures in history, when men struggle against tyranny and behold what they understand to be a vision of freedom.
The treasure was lost not because of historical circumstances and the adversity of reality but because no tradition had foreseen its appearance or its reality because no testament had willed it for the future. (Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future)
We watched them reading the names on television. This year DH didn't go down there, the scar in lower Manhattan. They're all gone now, and it's time to move on, he said.

I observed him in the dark hours of that morning. His body—beautiful in sleep, stripped bare of consciousness—betrayed a nearly imperceptible yet significant shift. As I clung to him, as I had done so many times before, I knew that this momentary comfort was merely an apparition of any real feeling that had existed between us.

I imagine that for him, losing one in a long list of lovers is laughably insignificant by comparison. He’s sad, he said. Sad about us.

I guess I’m sad, too. Wolper calls it grieving, which conjures to the mind the phrase: “He’s dead to me.” This seems overly dramatic, but not necessarily inapt. There is no more us—only a him and a me, both ghosts to one another. We have a past, but no vitality, no going forward. We’re all done now, and it’s time to move on, perhaps.

water's edge

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Dr. Lame-O

We drank our coffee in subdued silence. The terrace overlooked a row of sleepy wooden rooftops and just beyond, sand and ocean. The sun shone so brilliantly that the sulking was odd, even if he was “just not a morning person.” And no amount of pleasantries and uncharacteristic chirpiness from me could improve the mood. This is what the male ego looks like when bruised. Ah well. As I am wont to do in awkward social encounters, I chose to ignore it—blotting the sullen little man from my mind and retreating further into my imagination.

Early morning walk

“Well, I’m going to close my eyes and think about Andy Garcia,” I used to tell Ry when I found him particularly bothersome or tiresome. Ry was my ex of four undergraduate years (plus one additional) and possibly the most decent man I have met. So decent that, at the time, I didn't understand that I was bored. And I turned that boredom, quite undeservedly, into a perverse contempt. The more decent he was, the harder I pushed the limits of behavior. I guess you can call it some kind of personality defect, dear reader.

On this morning, it wasn’t Ry but a lesser man who, as I was to discover, believed that several months of occasional shared meals and the title of “friendship” entitled him to all sorts of things from me: explanations, confessions, physical intimacy, and apologies. The closer he came, the further I retreated. And in the quiet moments we spent on the island—chopping vegetables for dinner, listening to chirpy things of the evening, drinking our morning coffee—I thought about the someone else that I wanted by my side. Not Andy Garcia, although how I still love him, too!

As if intuiting my thoughts, he asked: “What kind of men do you find attractive?” I avoided a direct answer, wishing he had left the silence unbroken and dreading where this conversation would lead. After a pause and then some nonsense about compatibility, he launched into a tirade, a litany of my deficiencies as a friend. He’s known me for x-number of months and as a friend I shouldn’t be “putting up walls.” Further, he resents the fact that I don’t answer his phone calls in a timely manner, and as a friend he expects this modicum of civility, at the very least. Of course, because he considers himself “well in the middle of the neediness norm curve,” my lack of responsiveness as a friend to his friendly gestures indicates a kind of “self-centered quality” which he finds both “off-putting” and “unsettling.” At this point, he isn't even sure that he wants to sleep with me.

Here we go. I didn’t want to be confronted again about the nature of our so-called friendship, wherein he expresses his interest in advancing a romantic or sexual relationship and I express my complete indifference to that proposition. Every time I believe the matter settled, it unsettles itself again. Like now. And if by friendly gestures, he means caressing my belly and tentatively brushing up against the underside of my breast while I’m asleep on the couch, then yes, perhaps he deserves to be put off and unsettled. I've always maintained that he-and-I were not even a remote possibility. And I've disabused the notion that with the proper alchemy of environment and emotional distress, I could could be made to change my mind. Poof!

Still, I shouldn’t have agreed to come out here. The pretext for friendship was a lie, which we both used selfishly for our respective purposes. Should I feel guilty for using him as an escape hatch, to get away from that shit-storm, otherwise referred to as “my life”? Maybe. But if we are to take a purely utilitarian approach, what have I to gain from being in this strange friendship? I haven’t asked anything of him and I owe him no debt. And yet, he trumps up these grievances, using “as a friend” to now hold something against me, to elevate himself to a position to command my attention and to make me beholden to him. Not even my family and closest friends presume such access, so what makes him so special? And in all the trips that I've taken—with Trey, Huli, Dustbunny, Shani, Tuan, Xangas and Waldorf—none have attempted this sort of bullshit power play.

Because this trip was scarcely motivated by altruism. In spite of my reluctance over his offer, he persisted that this was only a friendly and Platonic favor to him:
Please, don’t let me down. I just don’t want to have spend the week alone on an island full of gay men.
I told him I was in a terrible emotional state and that he ought to find more pleasant company:
Good company is not required. I just don’t want to have spend the week alone on an island full of gay men.
And then he offered these words, which were a lifeline to me:
Really, you should come out here, not as a favor to me, but for yourself. It is a good place for reflection and to gain perspective.
I wanted to take it at face value, to understand his motives as genuine friendship and not what it really was—an attempt to manipulate the situation in service of his unspoken fantasy life.

Based on my observations of the last several days, I don’t know that I actually like him even as a friend. The reason he was out on at the beach that week was because of a certain arrangement doctors have with the community center—two hours a day at the clinic in exchange for swank lodging by the beach. It’s a sweet deal. Quite frankly, it was appalling the way he would divulge information about the walk-in cases, the way he would take my revulsion over his accounts of gonorrheal discharge and cock rings as support for his ostensible homophobia. Because to him they are not a self-selected group but typify the gay community. In the same breezy manner, he would explain how a diagnosis of fibromyalgia or IBS is a doctor’s way of telling his colleagues: “This patient is an asshole. The purported symptoms are psychosomatic.” As a confirmed hypochondriac, such cavalier attitudes within the medical profession about other people’s health is deeply unsettling. And although Dr. Lamo stopped short of revealing actual identities to stay just on this side of patient privacy, the contempt he holds for patients makes him hideous, if not outright unethical.

There is something indescribable in his movements and in his speech that give the impression of a cringing deformity. All of this is coated with a brittle veneer of snark. He is snide, covetous, prone to nasty little barbs to compensate for his nasty little insecurities. “That little bitch!” is how he referred to his Labrador who, at a moment of uncharacteristic disobedience, ran into the ocean to swim. Female canine aside, his dog’s behavior was entirely his own fault, keeping her off the leash. How was she expected to know the beach regulations? This reaction toward his beloved pet betrays a meanness—a creepy sort of impotence, which I suspect extends to human relationships. I can only imagine that names he calls me when I run off without regard to his pleasure.

You know what it all reminds me of, dear reader? The oblique sexual advances, the half-facetious innuendos, and the petty jabs? He reminds me of those thin and weak loner wolves, scavenging the peripheral area used by the pack. The misfits are most dangerous, always watching for scraps and
liable to snap from repressed rage.

Perhaps you think me unkind, dear reader. But in my present mood, I can't seem to find the patience for a friendship that is entirely rooted in guilt. So if that makes me awful, so be it. I am closing my eyes and dreaming about… Andy Garcia? Or, sadly, that someone else.

Vacated




P.S. I get an SMS a day later: “Are you pissed at me for some reason or are you just being you in ignoring friendly niceties?” Notice the passive-aggressive tone, phrased in such a way to induce me to defend myself against either
irrationality or socially dysfunction. Ah, but he forgets that avoidance is my primary coping mechanism. So fuck it. Maybe I am both irrational and dysfunctional, but I certainly have no interest in securing his good opinion.